Things I’ve made:
Things I have written:
By a leaner urban landscape, I mean structuring a society that makes the most efficient utilization of available resources, and minimizes redundancy of physical commodities and carbon footprint.
From Transportation & Accommodation: "I have covered long distances walking and cycling. Walking turned out to be massively inefficient, dull and time-consuming. Running is better option for distances less than fifty kilometers but its hard to run even with a small luggage. Last year I cycled around the island covering most of its periphery."
Interactions in a society are typically a reflection of personal experiences whereas works of art can transcend personal experiences.
Richness of a lifestyle lies not just in soaking in new experiences, but also in using them to create something that reduces disorder (ref: Thinking Dangerously).I have done well with the former part but have been struggling with the latter part.
Creating is much more complex than learning. While learning is an individual experience, creation is typically an outcome of a concerted effort of many.
I want to spend time thinking about transportation systems, ways to enrich a minimalist way of life, and learn newer forms of art the joy of which can be shared with people easily [3]. Sharing happiness is in itself a happiness.
I want to use my programming skills to utilize collective intelligence for a more efficient and economical lifestyle.But that takes time, effort and money. Money is something I don't have. I am still fighting off the urge to pick a programming job here which seems to be the easiest and worst option. Freelance projects maybe?
The madness of living a life in extremes used to be something elemental about my personality. It seems a distant memory now.
Their stories had an elemental freshness; they didn't have many contextual or cultural overtones. Their interaction wasn't delimited by social niceties or shaped by formality. It took little effort to connect to them.
I guess such places create a strong dissonance in the minds of people, the dissolution of which requires either a strong emotional attachment by getting involved with the society or creating a world of fantasy out of it.Cities like Hong Kong and Kolkata are probably good examples - these cities have served as a backdrop in many artworks. Both these cities are not immediately likable. It requires time and effort to develop a liking. However, their residents seem to nurture a strong bond with their hometown.
Unlike Beijing and Shanghai, where the cultural entities are prominently laid out for any traveler to gratify themselves without much effort or context, such cities require a visitor to already have a narrative so as to appreciate the richness of life behind their nondescript infrastructure.I will perceive things in a totally different light and depth when I revisit these cities.
A unique feature of Taiwanese townships is that the cultural lifestyle here is inextricably mixed with the character of a city. Its draggy, congested neighborhoods are peppered with clues to personal lives of its inhabitants.People don't mind leaving a lot of their belongings out in the open. Every morning a swarm of chirpy little breakfast stalls emerges in every nook and cranny, which disappear gradually by afternoon. I spent a good deal of time exploring the city of Taipei last year. There was a sweet charm in getting lost in the narrow tortuous alleys of this city. It had pockets of old neighborhoods interlaced with narrow lanes and flanked by dull facades of 公寓. Taipei's cityscape has striking resemblance to Seoul but their cultural rubrics are entirely different.
Everything that you do reduces disorder in some way. It creates certain predictable circumstances around which the juggernaut of randomness revolves. A piece of program, a postman delivering mails, a recently dug canal - all such activities lead towards a predictable and more ordered scenario. They facilitate flow of information and of matter.
The society that we humans have created is a severely closed group. You can't use its facilities without being a part of it.Think of a person who lives a minimalist life close to nature but wants to take a train or a flight to get somewhere far in little time. To do that, they need money. To have money, they need to do something that forces them to be a part of a society. It seems logical at first. But after a while, it seems a very inefficient design.
Restriction gives rise to notions of luxury and tourism. A luxury is a luxury only because it's hard to get it.
That's a step towards a more systematic urban landscape - we should own less and use publicly shared items more. Factors like catering immediately to a demand and reducing downtime can be taken care of by efficient technology.
I realized how differently our senses respond to stimuli when we decide to sleep outdoors. If I decide to sleep somewhere outside, my brain will start noticing minute details of the place.Even when I spent nights in less isolated areas, I wasn't able to relax and stop noticing each and every thing going on around me. It's amusing how homeless people get used to it.
Accommodation doesn't have to be as rigid and stationary as it stands today. It should shrink, transform or even disappear when not in use [More on this later].Think of what we could with all the space that lies unoccupied such as schools during vacations and empty homes when people are working or traveling.